Poor increase on HAV vaccination coverage among people living with HIV after an immunization-based intervention

Objectives To assess HAV serologic and vaccination status among people who live with HIV (PLWH), and to evaluate the impact of a vaccination-based strategy on HAV-negative patients in Seville, Spain. Methods Study with two time-overlapping phases: (i) cross-sectional study of HAV immunity prevalence among PLWH followed at a Spanish hospital between August 2019 and March 2020. (ii) Patients seronegative for HAV, reliably unvaccinated were included in a before-and-after quasi-experimental study, with an intervention focused on HAV vaccination according to national recommendations in force. Results Six hundred and fifty-six patients were included, of which 111 [17%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14–20%] were seronegative for HAV. Of these, 48 [43% (95% CI, 34–53%)] individuals were MSM. The absence of HAV immunity was attributed in 69 [62% (95% CI, 52–71%)] patients to non-referral to vaccination, followed by lack of achievement of a correct vaccination scheme [n=26;23% (95% CI, 16–32%)]. After the program implementation, 96 [15% (95% CI, 12–18%)] individuals were seronegative (17% vs. 15%, p=0.256), of whom 42 [41% (95% CI, 32–51%)] were MSM. The absence of immunity after the intervention was mainly attributed to: adherence failure in 23 [24.0% (95% CI, 15.8–33.7%)] patients, on-course immunization scheme in 34 [33% (95% CI, 24–43%)] individuals and pending appointment at the vaccine delivery unit in 20 [20.8% (95% CI, 13.2–30.3%)] patients. Conclusions A sizeable proportion of PLWH remains susceptible for HAV infection in future outbreaks. A program based on referral to the vaccine delivery unit yields poor results, largely due to program adherence failures. New strategies are needed to increase HAV vaccination coverage. Resumen Objetivos Evaluar la prevalencia de inmunidad frente al VHA en personas que viven con VIH así como el impacto de una intervención basada en la vacunación de pacientes seronegativos frente al VHA. Métodos Estudio con dos fases solapadas en el tiempo: 1) transversal de prevalencia de inmunidad frente al VHA en personas que viven con VIH seguidas en un hospital de tercer nivel, entre agosto de 2019 y el inicio de las medidas nacionales de contención de la epidemia por SARS-CoV-2, marzo de 2020. 2) Cuasiexperimental, con una intervención centrada en la vacunación frente a VHA de pacientes seronegativos, en la unidad responsable de esta. Resultados Ciento once (17%, [95% IC, 14-20%]) de los 656 pacientes incluidos eran seronegativos frente al VHA. Las principales causas de la ausencia de inmunidad fueron: 69 (62% [95% IC, 52-71%]) individuos no derivados a la unidad responsable de la vacunación;26 pacientes (23% [95% CI, 16-32%]) no completaron el esquema vacunal. Tras la intervención, 96 (15% [95% IC, 12-18%]) pacientes continuaron siendo seronegativos frente al VHA (comparada con la prevalencia basal, p=0,256), 42 (18% [95% IC, 13-23%]) eran HSH. Las principales causas de la ausencia de inmunidad fueron: 26 (23% [95% IC, 15-32%]) individuos presentaron fallos de adherencia al circuito vacunal;34 (33% [95% IC, 24-43%]) pacientes habían recibido una sola dosis;22 (22% [95% IC, 14-31%]) seguían sin una primera valoración por parte de la unidad responsable de la vacunación. Conclusiones Una proporción considerable de personas que viven con VIH, particularmente HSH, sigue siendo susceptible a la infección por VHA. La derivación sistemática a la unidad responsable de la vacunación se traduce en modestos incrementos de la prevalencia de inmunidad. Son necesarias nuevas estrategias para aumentar la cobertura vacunal.

Incidence of and factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among people living with HIV in Southern Spain after one year of pandemic.

Whether people living with HIV (PLWH) are at greater risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection is currently unknown. Prospective serologic studies may allow seroincidence analyses, where all infections are accurately identified. Because of this, we evaluated the incidence of associated factors with and the clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PLWH in Southern Spain. This prospective cohort study included PLWH from a Tertiary University Hospital in Southern Spain. Patients were enrolled in the study if (1) they had attended as outpatients our Unit from 1 August 2019 to 8 February 2020 and (2) had two subsequent evaluations from 9 February 2020 to 4 March 2021. SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed by PCR, antigen detection or serology. Seven hundred and nine PLWH were included in the study. Of them, 55 [7.8%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.9%-9.9%] patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Between 18 May and 29 November 2020, the rate of seroconversion was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.1%-9.0%) for the general population in the area of Seville and 2.3% (95% CI: 1.3%-2.6%) for PLWH in this study (p = .001). After multivariable analysis, adjusted by age, sex, and risk factors for HIV infection, active tobacco use and CDC stage, active tobacco smoking was the only factor independently associated with lower risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection [Incidence rate ratio: 0.29 (95% CI 0.16-0.55) p < .001]. In conclusion, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among PLWH in Southern Spain during the ongoing pandemic was lower than that reported for the general population in the same area.

Drug-drug interactions between treatment specific pharmacotherapy and concomitant medication in patients with COVID-19 in the first wave in Spain.

Primary aim was to assess prevalence and severity of potential and real drug-drug interactions (DDIs) among therapies for COVID-19 and concomitant medications in hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The secondary aim was to analyze factors associated with rDDIs. An observational single center cohort study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain from March 1st to April 30th. rDDIs refer to interaction with concomitant drugs prescribed during hospital stay whereas potential DDIs (pDDIs) refer to those with domiciliary medication. DDIs checked with The University of Liverpool resource. Concomitant medications were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Binomial logistic regression was carried out to identify factors associated with rDDIs. A total of 174 patients were analyzed. DDIs were detected in 152 patients (87.4%) with a total of 417 rDDIs between COVID19-related drugs and involved hospital concomitant medication (60 different drugs) while pDDIs were detected in 105 patients (72.9%) with a total of 553 pDDIs. From all 417 rDDIs, 43.2% (n = 180) were associated with lopinavir/ritonavir and 52.9% (n = 221) with hydroxychloroquine, both of them the most prescribed (106 and 165 patients, respectively). The main mechanism of interaction observed was QTc prolongation. Clinically relevant rDDIs were identified among 81.1% (n = 338) ('potential interactions') and 14.6% (n = 61) (contraindicated) of the patients. Charlson index (OR 1.34, 95% IC 1.02-1.76) and number of drugs prescribed during admission (OR 1.42, 95% IC 1.12-1.81) were independently associated with rDDIs. Prevalence of patients with real and pDDIs was high, especially those clinically relevant. Both comorbidities and polypharmacy were found as risk factors independently associated with DDIs development.